Windage -- it might not be a term you are familiar with...
It has to do with the power an electric motor loses stirring up the air. As the armature spins it acts like a centrifugal fan, and that consumes power. The classic 'can' motor typically has openings that allow air to escape, helping to cool the motor. But pumping out that air uses up some of the motor's power.
There is also viscous friction, as the armature poles spin past the magnets. The thin layer of air between them gets sheared, and that also costs power.
Now if you were to ask me what percentage of an electric motors power gets eaten up by windage I'd have to shrug, 'cause frankly I don't know. What I can tell you is it depends heavily on how fast the armature is spinning. A quick internet search revealed that windage losses increase approximately as the CUBE of the RPM's. Double the RPM's, eight times the loss!
Which still doesn't tell us how big a deal windage is. Is it small enough to ignore? Well, maybe. But that may be assuming too much. The very fact it has a name means at some point engineers thought it had a meaningful impact on motor performance.
Getting back to slotcar motors, would there be some advantage in reducing windage? Could closing off the vents in a can motor stop literally blowing power out of the motor? But would that cause the motor to overheat?
I'd say there might be a trade-off there. There are slotcars that operate at such extreme levels that any loss of cooling would quickly result in failure. But there are also many that aren't nearly so stressed.
I'm getting pumped to do some experiments with my 1/32nd scale slotcars. Could be interesting.
It has to do with the power an electric motor loses stirring up the air. As the armature spins it acts like a centrifugal fan, and that consumes power. The classic 'can' motor typically has openings that allow air to escape, helping to cool the motor. But pumping out that air uses up some of the motor's power.
There is also viscous friction, as the armature poles spin past the magnets. The thin layer of air between them gets sheared, and that also costs power.
Now if you were to ask me what percentage of an electric motors power gets eaten up by windage I'd have to shrug, 'cause frankly I don't know. What I can tell you is it depends heavily on how fast the armature is spinning. A quick internet search revealed that windage losses increase approximately as the CUBE of the RPM's. Double the RPM's, eight times the loss!
Which still doesn't tell us how big a deal windage is. Is it small enough to ignore? Well, maybe. But that may be assuming too much. The very fact it has a name means at some point engineers thought it had a meaningful impact on motor performance.
Getting back to slotcar motors, would there be some advantage in reducing windage? Could closing off the vents in a can motor stop literally blowing power out of the motor? But would that cause the motor to overheat?
I'd say there might be a trade-off there. There are slotcars that operate at such extreme levels that any loss of cooling would quickly result in failure. But there are also many that aren't nearly so stressed.
I'm getting pumped to do some experiments with my 1/32nd scale slotcars. Could be interesting.
Comment