How important is scenery? Surely a very personal question. But for those of us who have a home track it is easy to gauge. Simply look at the track. It should be very obvious how much time, effort and money has been expended on creating scenery.
Of course that has a lot to do with how much skill, time and money one can lavish on creating realistic scenery. Also how much space is available on the track platform.
I believe it is the rare slotter who cannot be awed when presented with the true artistry of a beautifully scenicked track. Some folks bring so much talent and care to creating their track scenery that when properly photographed it can be confused with the real thing.
And it is no coincidence that those same artisans create beautiful, realistic slotcars. The talents, skills and aesthetics required are the same. The totality of their miniature worlds can be astonishingly realistic.
Of course there are far more people who do scenick their tracks, but fall short of artistry. No shame in that. We all have our limits, and real life does insist on getting in the way. Some track buildings, static cars and plastic people will enhance a layout even if they don't add up to a photorealistic diorama.
Then there are folks who don't add any scenery at all to their tracks. The commercial raceway with scenery is very rare. And many home tracks lack scenery simply because their owners have never bothered, or been able, to create any. They might still own or have created beautiful and realistic cars, and their tracks might be impressive and great to race on, but no scenery.
As a teenager back in the 1960's I had the time to add scenery to my home track. Not much talent or money, but time. Since then I haven't scenicked any of my tracks. I have, however, also built a model railroad, and did create scenery for that. Somehow I decided that was appropriate and necessary.
Most of the 1/32nd tracks in the IHSR club I belong to have some scenery. Mine does not primarily because there simply is not enough space on the platform for it. But I do appreciate the tracks that do have scenery. And I am frankly awed by those that exhibit real artistry. (And entertained by that subversive scenery that is comical!)
Does realistic scenery add to the racing experience? Gosh, that's a tough question to answer. When driving I have no brain cycles available for appreciating scenery -- so I reluctantly say 'no'. But if I am observing a race -- like when marshaling -- yes, I think it does.
I find scenery can actually be an impediment when driving if it obscures my view of my car. But I won't criticize the track owner for that. At least not out loud.
I'm sure some folks reading this post have differing opinions on the topic. Go on. Let me have it!
Some other folks may want to share photos of track scenery they created and are obscenely proud of. Show it!
Of course that has a lot to do with how much skill, time and money one can lavish on creating realistic scenery. Also how much space is available on the track platform.
I believe it is the rare slotter who cannot be awed when presented with the true artistry of a beautifully scenicked track. Some folks bring so much talent and care to creating their track scenery that when properly photographed it can be confused with the real thing.
And it is no coincidence that those same artisans create beautiful, realistic slotcars. The talents, skills and aesthetics required are the same. The totality of their miniature worlds can be astonishingly realistic.
Of course there are far more people who do scenick their tracks, but fall short of artistry. No shame in that. We all have our limits, and real life does insist on getting in the way. Some track buildings, static cars and plastic people will enhance a layout even if they don't add up to a photorealistic diorama.
Then there are folks who don't add any scenery at all to their tracks. The commercial raceway with scenery is very rare. And many home tracks lack scenery simply because their owners have never bothered, or been able, to create any. They might still own or have created beautiful and realistic cars, and their tracks might be impressive and great to race on, but no scenery.
As a teenager back in the 1960's I had the time to add scenery to my home track. Not much talent or money, but time. Since then I haven't scenicked any of my tracks. I have, however, also built a model railroad, and did create scenery for that. Somehow I decided that was appropriate and necessary.
Most of the 1/32nd tracks in the IHSR club I belong to have some scenery. Mine does not primarily because there simply is not enough space on the platform for it. But I do appreciate the tracks that do have scenery. And I am frankly awed by those that exhibit real artistry. (And entertained by that subversive scenery that is comical!)
Does realistic scenery add to the racing experience? Gosh, that's a tough question to answer. When driving I have no brain cycles available for appreciating scenery -- so I reluctantly say 'no'. But if I am observing a race -- like when marshaling -- yes, I think it does.
I find scenery can actually be an impediment when driving if it obscures my view of my car. But I won't criticize the track owner for that. At least not out loud.
I'm sure some folks reading this post have differing opinions on the topic. Go on. Let me have it!
Some other folks may want to share photos of track scenery they created and are obscenely proud of. Show it!
Comment